Free Special Resources
Get Your FREE Special Report. Download Any One Of These FREE Special Resources, Instantly!
Featured Special Report
Claim Your Free Copy of Overtime Primer: Highlights from the New Regulations

The federal DOL overtime regulations go into effect this year. Are you ready?

Download Now!

This report includes a summary of key changes, including the salary level test and salary basis test.

As a bonus, we've included a handy flowchart to help you determine exemption status under the FLSA.

Download Now!
December 26, 2002
California Court Rules on 'Non-Compete' Contracts
For a Limited Time receive a FREE Compensation Market Analysis Report! Find out how much you should be paying to attract and retain the best applicants and employees, with customized information for your industry, location, and job. Get Your Report Now!
>The California Supreme Court ruled that out-of-state companies "may" be able to enforce employee "non-compete" agreements at rival firms in the Golden State, the San Francisco Chronicle reports.

At the center of the case is a California law that prohibits "every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business." The law has been interpreted to ban non-compete clauses, which typically prevent employees from going to a rival company within a certain period of time, according to the Chronicle.

The court ruled that a California court did not have an "exceptional circumstance" in order to bar an out-of-state lawsuit against an employee in California, the Chronicle reports. The case stemmed from an employee who signed a non-compete clause in Minnesota and then went to work for a California company.

The clause said the worker, for a period of two years, could not work on a product at a new company that competed with products he worked on at the Minnesota firm. Employers contend they need to have employees sign such agreements in order to protect trade secrets and intellectual property.

Attorneys tell the Chronicle the ruling is narrow and it is unclear what kind of an impact it will have on other cases. However, the California Supreme Court's ruling allows the Minnesota firm to move forward with its case against its former employee.

"This case will only make it more difficult for workers who sign non- compete agreements, which are not legal in California, to come and work for California firms," says the California Deputy Attorney General Joseph Ragazzo.

Featured Special Report:
Top 100 FLSA Overtime Q&As
Twitter  Facebook  Linked In
Follow Us
Copyright © 2016 Business & Legal Resources. All rights reserved. 800-727-5257
This document was published on
Document URL: